Wise Methods Under Scrutiny
Any hint that the games were somehow "fixed" could lead to sports being seen as an entertainment, not a competition, like wrestling. NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell responded to a question about the biggest threat to the integrity of his sport in 2012 "Gambling would be number one on my list." Pro leagues would not even consider a franchise in Las Vegas, for fear of the proximity to legal gambling, until the NHL Golden Knights were awarded a franchise. Players were warned to report any contact with gamblers. The NFL and other leagues spent significant money lobbying for the continuation of the 1992 Professional and Sports Protection Act (PASPA), which outlawed sports gambling. An attitudinal sea change occurred last May when Murphy v. NCAA challenged the federal prohibition against gambling embodied in PASPA.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit https://www.forbes.com/sites/leighsteinberg/2018/11/28/sports-gambling-is-evolving-more-rapidly-than-we-expected/
The Nitty-gritty On Fast Methods For
It refers onlytoslotmachines, tablegames, and dice games. The common thread among each of these illustrative examples is that they are games which are played and its outcomes are primarily determined within the four walls of a casino. By contrast, sports wagering centers on the results of real-world events and athletic performances taking place wholly outside of a casino property. Taking each of these factors individually or collectively, it seems fairly obvious that a ballot question that does not mention the words sports betting and ties the definition of casino gambling to games typically foundin casinos (listing as examples only those games confined to a casino property) could not have reasonably given Florida voters the requisite fair notice that sports betting a form of gambling found in casinos in only 6 out of 40 states and where the outcome is largely determined by performances taking place outside the four walls of a casino would be included within its scope. As a result, Florida lawmakers remain free to legislate in this area without voter consent. Exceptions to compact exclusivity: South Floridas racinos The more salient question going forward is whether and to what extent Florida lawmakers can legalize sports betting without jeopardizing the lucrative revenue-sharing payments that the State of Florida receives from the Seminole Tribe under a 2010 gaming compact. Under the 2010 compact , the Seminole Tribe has the exclusive right to offer banked table games, such as blackjack, and any new game authorized by law (which would presumably include sports betting), in exchange for making annual payments to the state. Last year, these annual payments totaled more than $290 million . The 2010 compact gives the Seminoles the LIVE BETTING right to cease or reduce these payments if they lose their exclusivity through a change in Florida law. One such trigger is where Florida law is amended by the Florida Legislature to allow new forms of Class III gaming or other casino-style gaming that were not in operation as of February 1, 2010. Certainly, if the Florida Legislative were to legalize sports betting on a statewide basis, the Seminole Tribe would likely have the right to cease all payments made to the state. But its an entirely different story if the Legislature were to allow sports betting at the eight racetrack casinos or racinos located in Broward and Miami-Dade Counties.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit https://www.forbes.com/sites/danielwallach/2018/11/19/no-recount-needed-florida-gambling-amendment-does-not-cover-sports-betting/